Artificial Emotional Intelligence is our name for what this system is — and the line we draw against artificial general intelligence. It works in two directions. Outward, agents read the emotional state of the person they're interacting with — from real signals in language, pattern, and history — and adjust tone, approach, and response to fit. Inward, and more fundamentally, the system carries its own internal affective signals: functional emotions, not felt ones, that drive its learning. They decide what it attends to, what it keeps, and what shapes it over time — so emotion isn't only something it reads in you, it's the mechanism by which it gets better. We chose the term deliberately, to stand apart from AGI: we're not claiming a general mind that rivals humans across every task — we haven't built that and don't claim to. We're claiming something narrower and real — an architecture where emotion, both interpreted and internal, is the foundation for how the system learns and behaves. It's new and powerful precisely because it isn't a claim about AGI. And to be clear: functional analogs of emotion are not consciousness or sentience.